A written and recorded agreement, based on natural love and affection between parents, is applicable without consideration. In Rajkukhy Dabee v Bhootnath Mookerjee. It is well established in English law and in the Indian Contract Act that consideration is essential for an enforceable contract. It is an act or abstinence by the promised or another person, at the request of the promisor. The reflection may have passed, future or executor. In accordance with the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the definition of consideration in section 2 d), reflection may be made by “the promisor or any other person” as long as it is done “at the request of the promisor.” Thus, if the promiseor has no objection, the consideration of a promise or another person may differ from that of another person. There are some cases where contracts are enforceable without consideration. Some types of contracts are only valid in writing, for example. B real estate transactions or contracts of more than 12 months. These laws vary by state. Although oral contracts are legal, they can be very difficult to prove in court, it is generally preferable to obtain each contractual agreement in writing. In each of these cases, such an agreement is a contract.
The term “counterpart” is used in the sense of “something against a quid pro quo. An agreement without consideration is a simple promise, and exnudo pacto non aritio actio cannot be made mandatory for the parties. Sir Frederick Pollock defined the reflection: “This is the price for which the promise of the other is bought, and the promise thus made for value is enforceable.” www.preservearticles.com/2012012621491/exceptions-to-consideration-no-consideration-and-no-contract.html According to the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the definition of section 2 d consideration may be taken into account by “promise or any other person” as long as it is made “at the request of the promisor.” Thus, if the promiseor has no objection, the consideration of a promise or another person may differ from that of another person. In Venkata Chinnaya v. Venkataramaya Garu, an old lady gave the accused, her daughter, and in any case landed property as a gift. The conditions are that a mandatory pension of R. 653 must be paid annually to the complainant, the sister of the old lady. The defendant was executed in the plaintiffs n.B. and iqrarnama and agreed to implement this provision. The applicant appealed because the defendant had not paid the pension.
Here was the consideration of the accused promise to pay the pension was the gift made by the old lady and the consideration was made by the plaintiff on the condition. A promise to pay for a previous voluntary service is mandatory and these agreements do not require an exception. Services need to be provided on a voluntary basis. For example, if A B supports, son and B promises to pay the expenses of A. It`s a contract. when he realized that B had a legal obligation to support his grandson. In accordance with this exception, the promise must be to compensate a person who has done something for the promisor, not for a person who has done nothing for the promisor.